Rethinking Religion and Its Relevance in the Now

Hope, is not something innate. At least, I don’t believe so. Not like love or fear, I don’t think that we have hope when we were born. I don’t think we are even capable of expecting something really. I mean, literally,  we can’t even see back then. Let alone to hope for something that we don’t understand yet.

We learn hope. By interacting with our surroundings, with the people around us, we learn this humane trait of hope. Be it from being introduced into this dream of being a fireman, astronaut or Richie rich. Or even from something as simple as getting a new bike, because you just got good scores in our school report. This notions of winning something that we set a target for, that created hope. We were trained to hope.

Back in 2012, I spent almost 3 weeks in Cambodia volunteering at an orphanage. It was a fairly normal experience, life changing of course, but for a voluntary mission, it was fairly regular. There, I had to paint a classroom, teach English, treat kids hairs for lice, nail bamboos to make a floor for a simple house, those sorts of things.

The kids was of course very grateful and charming. They were all really sweet and full of smiles, different from the kids here in Jakarta (you know what I mean, those little bastards have had it coming), and they were all really discipline in their way. They would always clean whatever they used, they would help each other out, they would finish their homework and they would pray.

Now, this particular orphanage is run by a christian organisation. The guy that brought me there, which was a really inspiring teacher of mine, is a christian priest.

In the end of our mission, they held a service for us and prayed not only for their own blessings, but also for ours, who volunteered there for a week or so. These orphans, who doesn’t have a family apart from each other looked really happy at that time. They played music, they danced, they joke around and most importantly they smiled. Not the kind of smile when somebody open the door for us, not even the kind of smile when you finally got that amazon package we were waiting for. But a real genuine one. A big happy face smile.

These kids, who were not born into a family. Who lived in a country, that (only just around 10 years before) was massacred, tortured and enslaved. These kids who are supposed to hate the world for the unfairness that they are facing. These kids that could never dream of having a happy meal, while on the other side of the world, that very food was being thrown away just because they already got the toys. These kids can genuinely smile.

But how can they smile with their predicament? How can they smile when I can’t even smile that way, and I have all the privileges in the world of being a normal kid.

I asked that question every day after I got home from that mission. Until one day it hit me. They had hope. Their religion gave them hope.

They don’t need money, or new bikes or anything to give them a sense of hope, because in their mind (and heart) they have their God to wait for. They have their heaven to be hoping for. And that may just be enough to keep them happy everyday, knowing that they belong to the same heaven as anyone who may have more things that they have.

I am not a religious person myself. I was quite an avid prayer because of my mom when I was a kid, but now I rarely go to church or even pray. I pray for my food because it has become an involuntary habit, but other than that, as far as your concern, I’m the devil.

tolerance

But I am always fascinated by religion and how it affects people. Be it in a large group, small group or even in an individual level.

The laws of religion has rarely changed, but the way people interact with it, is very unique. I never think of religion as a problem or a solution. I always think of it as a way of life and a guidance to help you take your steps. You don’t necessarily need it, but some people prefer to have it anyway.

And for so long, this guidance has never change whatsoever. It has never made any attempt to adjust itself to be more relevant to the age that they are living in. That’s why you can always see conflicts like the blasphemy case in Jakarta every now and then. Be it with Gus Dur, Ahok or anyone that has not follow the guidance as is really. And that’s why (partly) we have terror groups and racism.

Yet, once or twice, you see figures like the Dalai Lama or Pope Francis saying something really far from the normal things that the guidance would say and it makes you wonder.

Just recently, Pope Francis hinted that He might be okay with married Priest in the catholic church. This is huge, considering that for the past 2000 years that this religion exist, this rule has always been there and is seen as one of the most important ones. Yet, with decreasing numbers of priests and followers, and with the changing nature of our society along with the ever-moving time, these supposedly stubborn guidance has showed its willingness to adapt. I mean the pope has an Instagram, if that’s not enough proof.

Does this mean religion is cool? I still don’t think so. I think religion is a personal experience, and whether we choose to follow a certain religion or not is totally an individual call. It has shown its ugly sides, yes, but it has also shown its willingness to adapt and to be more than just an archaic novelty from the past. It is with no doubt an important part for a lot of people’s life, and a source of annoyance for many others. But I think religion serves a certain purpose in life, and while its function might not be the same along the time, I think it is wrong to disregard it entirely.

For more than 2000 years, we’ve gotten used to a certain role of religion, when I think that role is overdue for a change. Its governance was a fit for the roman empire, but its old value needs to be adapted into a more open value that our society have already attain. Otherwise, the hope that a lot of people have, will only turn into terror, hatred and fear.

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind – AE

The Br’er Rabbit

And the Oscar goes to………….

Nobody. Because whoever won it only deserves it because they are white. Hence, the whole ceremony is invalid, and whoever pays attention to it, is racist.

I don’t know whether that is Spike Lee’s and Jada Pinkett’s intention or not, but after boycotting the whole thing, I guess that’s what comes across to most people, and if that’s so, then they’re barking at the wrong tree.

racism_642745

Do we really live in a racist society, though? Or have we put ourselves in a position where we have become oversensitive about everything? Even after societal obstacles has been put aside? Are we maybe just stuck in a transition phase, where new ideas and diverse values are still opposed by old ideas?

I honestly don’t know what to think about. As Asian, I’m just used to the thinking that we exist and nobody gives a fuck about it. I mean, we never really get the “white privilege” of sorts, and we’ve never really been that much oppressed or been enslaved by other races. I mean we enslaved ourselves and sometimes the whites enslaved us, but even then, we (as a race) tend to just let it past and never really ask for the same sorts of privilege as what happened in the Oscar right now.

The American Negro never can be blamed for his racial animosities – he is only reacting to 400 years of the conscious racism of the American whites. – Malcolm X

But again that’s the main problem isn’t it?

That we will never able to put ourselves in each other’s shoes. The closest person to ever even remotely feel other race’s shoes is maybe Michael Jackson. And that guy was basically God.

So why it seems then? that this problem keeps on rolling on our yard? I mean not only in terms of race, but things like gender equality and God knows how many other stuff that speaks to personal preferences and (in my opinion) will never get sorted out because every single person has their own unique ways of seeing it.

Don’t get me wrong, though, some things do need to be sorted out. Things like pay equality between genders, racist justice systems and issues like slavery in general. But when we hunt for privileges like the ones in the Oscar, it becomes an entirely different thing.

I get that Oscar is a celebration of art, and that every race should have at least a tiny bite of the pie so that everyone feels represented. But does it really matter that much? Or are we just pushing it that bit too far?

Should we really worry about this? Or is this just the case of pettiness?

I guess the thing about human is that we, as a species, tend to assume. We assume that everybody wants the same thing, and we assume that as a group we will fight for the same beliefs. And if I’m prepared to guess, both Spike Lee and Jada Pinkett are expecting all black actors to do the same thing.

The whole Oscar boycott has become some sort of enforcement by a particular group to get what they believed in, without really considering any other aspects. And that’s why it is hard for me to sympathise with them. It becomes similar to when I read about a Muslim group (allegedly) asking for the government of Germany to ban alcohol (apparently to prevent sexual attacks). It is not equal by any means, but the point is that it becomes more like an enforcement of beliefs rather than an act of repression by the allegedly “privileged”.

And that is one of the human tendency that I am not a fan of. At one thing, it can come from a good intention, where people just want to feel the same, and that they want for others to believe and feel the same thing. But on the other hand, it can be blinding. And turns people to some kind of extremist that demands something to be believed.

I mean what are the alternatives? In the case of Alcohol ban thingy, if people don’t like alcohol, then simply don’t touch it. If they think alcohol is bad, other people might think the otherwise, and it becomes entirely their rights to decide whether they will consume it or not. That’s why (partly) we have tax so that people can be discouraged while still having the ability to choose. And I don’t see why the same can’t be applied to Oscar too. I mean really what are the alternatives? Are we really going to make an obligatory nomination for Black, Asian, Red heads, et cetera, et cetera? Am I really going to see Di Caprio losing to some random Korean actor? Or Kevin Hart?

I don’t really know what’s right what’s wrong here. Maybe the Oscar is indeed corrupt. Maybe it’s not. All I’m asking is that have we (as a society) considered the possibility of being a tad bit oversensitive?

“Sometimes the Bible in the hand of one man is worse than a whisky bottle in the hand of (another)… There are just some kind of men who – who’re so busy worrying about the next world they’ve never learned to live in this one, and you can look down the street and see the results.”